State of Play

Invalid Govt etc

I have not written anything here for a while due to;

1. Distraction by a temporary health issue (cancer, not vax caused), and

2. I didn’t want to just ramble on without any real purpose or point.

So, hopefully, this ramble will be pertinent.

I, personally, believe that the Treaty of Waitangi is a fraudulent document due to actions taken by the Crown through Hobson, (deceit and coercion) making this contract null and void.

Despite what some have said to me, the Treaty is most definitely a contract as any agreement between parties is, by definition, that very thing.

However, many people believe that the Treaty is valid and something that can be used for their benefit.

Given that;

Then the next important point to make is that the Treaty, as it is written, also creates a Trust with the Queen (the Crown) as the Trustee for the native people and all their lands, etc.

The purpose of a Trust is to protect the assets or other things named in the originating Trust document.

So the Native people are Beneficiaries of said Trust.

Beneficiaries are prohibited from entering into agreements, signing documents, etc for anything that is recorded as being within the Trust.

This is standard Trust law.

Only the Trustees can make these decisions, or contract agreements.

Beneficiaries can certainly demand that the Trustees account for any and all decisions made, and the Trustees may be prosecuted for anything ‘untoward’, damaging the assets etc of said Trust.

Beneficiaries can also replace said Trustees if they feel, or believe, the Trustees are not acting in the best interests of the Beneficiaries.

A problem arises when there are so many beneficiaries with differing views on what are the ‘best interests’ of the natives and their lands, mana, taonga, etc.

Unsurprisingly, the Trustees have their own agenda as to what and whose best interests they are acting for, ie the Trustees are behaving in such a manner as to promote their interests all while claiming they are acting in the best interest of the Beneficiaries.

This is the basis for all the ‘loss’ of lands, mana, taonga, etc. that the Beneficiaries have suffered.

But, as the Trustees are without validity, and are in breach of the Trust terms, those losses are only apparent and shall be restored.

The Trustees of the Crown are Crown representatives, and are also members and friends of the NZ Parliament/Govt which is more correctly known as the Settler Parliament, to differentiate it from Westminster Parliament.

The importance of this difference is that the Westminster Parliament created the Constitution Act of 1852 that granted a right for the settlers to govern themselves, but only themselves.

After WWII, the colonies of Canada, Australia and New Zealand felt that they should be independent and demanded such a legislative change to reflect that.

Westminster Parliament denied this demand as these colonies lacked any legal rights to such.

A primary basis for any independent state is;

State

A sovereign state, an entity with the attributes of statehood, namely, a defined territory, permanent population, effective government and the ability to enter into international relations.

New Zealand Law Dictionary, 10^th edition 2022

A defined territory would mean the land which was, and still is, held in Trust for the Beneficiaries (natives).

There is somewhat of a problem there, since claiming the land as being owned by the settlers for the purpose of setting up a nation/state is direct breach of the Trust’s terms.

These colonies were in fact set up as legal entities (otherwise known as companies), such as the New Zealand Company (which was absorbed by the New South Wales Company), meaning that they cannot just be ‘converted’ into a nation/state by company statute, because a government of the people is, legally speaking, in direct opposition to a company.

For example, a valid nation/state requires a constitution created and agreed to by the people of that land (the defined territory). The constitution has terms that create, and limit, the government. All governments are really just a fictional administrative organisation to carry out the will of the people.

After the demands of the colonies were made clear, Westminster Parliament took the situation in hand and created the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act, 1947 to stop the colonies from doing something stupid.

In the Schedule, section 8, a clear statement is made;

1. “Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to confer any power to repeal or alter …. the Constitution Act of the Dominion of New Zealand otherwise than in accordance with the law existing before the commencement of this Act.”

Amazingly, 39 years later the Settler Parliament decided to go their own way and do something stupid.

In 1986, in direct contravention of the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act, 1947, the Settler Parliament repealed the Westminster Parliament’s 1852 Constitution Act.

Important points;

1. the Settler Parliament was not the creator of the 1852 act and therefore lacked the prerogative power to repeal or alter said Act.

2. this genius move meant that the Settler Parliament dissolved itself.

3. a dissolved entity, purportedly a government, requires a new constitution created and agreed to by the people, such that a new government can be formed.

4. by definition, a government cannot write its own constitution.

5. any attempt by a government entity to write its own constitution is fraud.

6. A company, however, can write, or rewrite, its constitution, via a resolution passed by its owners.

7. Is this mob (the Settler Parliament) willing to admit they are in fact a company, not a government?

8. Is this mob (the Settler Parliament) aware that every harm, injury or loss they have caused since 1986 is a private and personal liability against each and every one of them?

9. Is that why they (the Settler Parliament)are so desperately trying to get new definitions of the Treaty accepted?

Next Point;

The purported NZ government is registered as;

1. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of New Zealand

CIK000216105 and CIK0000216102

with the United States Securities Exchange Commission

I believe this particular entry is now lapsed, but it shows that it was registered and that means that it was/is subject to the Codes of the US as it was/is registered there.

2. THE QUEEN'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND

OE021881

with Companies House UK.

3. THE SOVEREIGN IN RIGHT OF NEW ZEALAND ACTING BY AND THROUGH THE SECRETARY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND TRADE

OE020656

with Companies House UK.

Both 2 and 3 are current from 27/1/2023.

So, these are overseas registered too, ie., foreign to New Zealand.

The Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Trade wrote to me that these are “not companies, but are leases”.

Now isn’t that interesting.

So, leasing is what occurs through ‘land’ titles.

When a titled property is purchased, the purchaser (a legal name, eg John Jack SMITH) becomes the tenant of the land that the title refers to and he or she can use that land and gain the fruits of it – known in legal terms as “usufruct” and is often written on mortgages that way.

William the Conqueror (aka, william the bastard) did just that when he conquered the English Crown and took the titles to the lands which he demanded the rents and emoluments thereof.

Next Point;

Every government ministry, department, agency, etc, is registered as a commercial entity.

I have list of quite a few, I imagine there are many more.

I am limited to free searches as now many sites require membership, such as Dun and Bradstreet.

So you will have to do your own searches.

However, I do have this from previous searching;

Dun and Bradstreet

NEW ZEALAND POLICE Wellington NI 6011

DUNS590216123

and this

companiesnz.com

New Zealand Police

NCN300001205

and this

companiesnz.com

` Ministry of Justice (all courts)

300001099

and of course every council like this

companiesnz.com

Far North District Council

300000109

and this

companiesnz.com

Whangarei District Council

300002594

and so on.

(This link -

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/

is very useful for accessing the NZGovt/company statutes from which the following is quoted.)

As they are undoubtedly commercial entities, for any interaction between them and persons there must be a prior contract agreement of some sort;

Companies Act 1993

180 Method of contracting

(1) A contract or other enforceable obligation may be entered into by a company as follows:

(a) an obligation which, if entered into by a natural person, would, by law, be required to be by deed

This means that each and every claim for payment or action, made by any agent of these commercial entities, shall have a pre-existing, verifiable, deed of contract.

A contract deed requires wet ink signatures of all parties involved.

All contracts require agreement, via discussion in some manner, of the details and specifically meaning full disclosure of any material facts.

Any lack of disclosure is deceit.

Any kind of force, such as a statement like this - “you must sign/agree or (something) will happen to you”, is coercion.

Any instance of deceit or coercion makes the contract ‘null and void’ from the outset (ab initio), and this applies whenever you happen to discover said deceit or coercion.

Without such a prior agreement/contract any such claim or demand for payment or action is likely to be in breach of;

Fair Trading Act 1986

Unfair Conduct

s7 Unconscionable conduct

(1) A person must not, in trade, engage in conduct that is

unconscionable.

And

s13 False or misleading representations

And

s21C Prohibition on asserting right to payment in respect of unsolicited goods or unsolicited services

And quite likely

Crimes Act 1961

s240 Obtaining by deception or causing loss by deception

And that is just for starters.

Of course, as these commercial organisations are subjects of the Crown, then all such statutes are binding on them.

Whereas we the people are not bound by such statues - unless we agree/contract to be so bound.

This is why corporate agents constantly attempt (through deceit) to get us to agree to be the surety for the legal person (eg, John Jack SMITH) thereby assuming the bond (to be bound as a subject)

Therefore, each and every demand/claim made to, or against, your legal person requires verifiable, and original, proof of contract deed, signed in wet ink, by all parties involved.

As they certainly lack this, my best advice is;

Do Not Pay, or Obey, in any way.

Next Point;

All government entities (ministries, councils, etc), claim either directly, or indirectly, ownership of land, which is a false claim in itself as being a fictional entity they cannot own anything tangible. They can own titles, as these are fictional just like these government entities.

The Treaty makes it clear in the pre-emption clause, where it is stipulated, that all land sales and grants must be done via the Queen, her successors, etc.

Where is the provenance showing the Queen, her successors, etc. having ever purchased any land in NZ, from which land grants could be made?

Ergo, all the land titles, lack validity unless there is verifiable provenance.

Without said provenance, all the government claims for ownership of land titles are invalid and unless they are going to use the Trustee defence, they shall ‘return’ lands claimed.

They shall repair, remediate and repatriate the lands they illegally deemed to belong to the Crown and of course any and all claims made, actions taken, by these agents for the Crown, that have diminished or damaged the native lands, mana, taonga, etc, require these Crown agents to make reparations.

Next Point;

I hear, and read, a lot about govt debt, and council debt, and how much we have to repay, etc.

This is related to everything above.

So, unless your legal person has agreed to, and signed, a contract for this debt, then you have zero liability for this debt.

However, the same cannot be said for the Crown agents that have signed these contracts for the debt

Furthermore, and more importantly, this purported debt very likely does not actually exist. The financial system works entirely on credit/debit double entry accounting. No actual money is used (if it even exists).

Your loans and mortgages are actions of fraud by the banks as they did not ‘lend’ any funds.

The fact of the matter is, upon signing the loan or mortgage document, your legal person has created a Security Bond which will be deceitfully extracted from your legal person by the bank staff, and sold on the Bond market.

You do not owe anything to the banks regarding this, due to the fraud committed by the bank.

There is a plethora of evidence to this effect.

The global bankster system is a penumbra of psychopaths controlling (almost) all financial transactions, in control of the (mainstream or legacy) media, (almost) all the scientific and medical divisions of our society as well as the (re)writing of history.

Their financial system is all smoke and mirrors with nothing of any substance backing it up.

1. Their media constantly and consistently lie about everything as per the instructions from their masters.

2. Their corruption of science and medicine has reached a peak of genocide now.

3. And what of history? What parts are true, if any?

4. Where are we really from?

5. What really happened in the wars, and who really caused these wars that massacred millions, billions?

Etc., etc.

Conclusion/summary;

1. The purported government, and all its branches, are acting in fraud.

2. Our reality is that the planet has been captured by the very worst people ever.

3. But our reality is also that we are separate to their ‘system’ because we actually exist, whereas their ‘system’ is an entire imaginary figment.

4. Once each of us come to terms with this true reality, and can stand up for ourselves, our families and our friends, no matter the circumstances, then we can rebuild our society.

5. The system we are surrounded by is not now, nor has it ever been, that of a representative governmental body.

6. The system is entirely commercial contract driven.

7. Most of us work for the company, shop in the company store, buying the company goods, with wages from the company.

8. All interactions between the company and us must be through the legal person (fiction to fiction, like to like), and absolutely must have a pre-existing contract.

9. As such a contract does not exist, then I reiterate;

Do Not Pay, or Obey, in any way.

Goodbye.

I shall soon be back to full health and perhaps more substacks to come.